Welcome to the Compressed Air Filter Comparison Application, from Parker
This tool is designed to help you make an informed decision when selecting your compressed air filters. Simply follow the four stages to determine the real payback period for your compressed air filter.
This tool will only offer comparisons on filters that are independently validated according to ISO 12500-1:2007. If necessary, deviations from this standard are indicated.
|
Stage 1
Selection
|
Stage 2
Parameters
|
Stage 3
Energy Comparison
|
Stage 4
Payback Comparison
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Choose which Parker and competitor filters to compare | Set your operational parameters | View the comparative energy usage and potential cost savings | View the comparative payback period for both filter and elements |
|
Stage 1
Selection
|
Stage 2
Parameters
|
Stage 3
Energy Comparison
|
Stage 4
Payback Comparison
|
|---|
To compare compressed air filters, first select a Parker filter and then a maximum of two competitor filters from the menus below. We can then begin the comparison process.
| 1 | 2 | 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | ||
|
||
| Filter | ||
| Diff pressure | ||
| bar | bar | bar |
Notes:
|
Stage 1
Selection
|
Stage 2
Parameters
|
Stage 3
Energy Comparison
|
Stage 4
Payback Comparison
|
|---|
Simply provide your operational parameters below to allow an accurate comparison to be made. If you need help to locate this information, click the icon for assistance.
| Compression / Power Consumption | kWh i Rated motor power of the compressor |
|---|---|
| or Free Air Delivery | i 1 m³/h appr. equals to 0.1 kWh rated motor power (acc. to EnEffAH brochure 2012, page 18; www.eneffah.de) |
| Annual Operating Hours | h/a i 1-shift operation appr. 2000 h/a, 2-shift appr. 4000 h/a, 3-shift appr. 8000 h/a, max. 8760 h/a |
| Annual Power Consumption | kWh/a i Product of "Compressor nominal power" × "Annual operating hours" |
| Electricity Cost | €/kWh i Electric rate |
Free air delivery metric conversion table
| @ 20 °C, 1 bar(a) | @ 20 °C, 1 bar(a) | @ 0 °C, 1 bar(a) | @ 0 °C, 1 bar(a) | @ 60 °F, 1 bar(a) |
| m³/h | m³/min | Nm³/h | Nm³/min | SCFM |
| 1 | 0.016666667 | 0.931775542 | 0.015529592 | 0.58054672 |
Notes:
|
Stage 1
Selection
|
Stage 2
Parameters
|
Stage 3
Energy Comparison
|
Stage 4
Payback Comparison
|
|---|
Review the comparitive power consumption and energy cost savings by choosing Parker over the competitor filter.
| Vendor | ||
|---|---|---|
|
|
||
| Filter | ||
| Filter Power Consumption (per year) | ||
| Filter Energy Costs (per year) | ||
Notes:
|
Stage 1
Selection
|
Stage 2
Parameters
|
Stage 3
Energy Comparison
|
Stage 4
Payback Comparison
|
|---|
Simply enter the cost of individual filters and elements to compare the payback period for Parker filters against competitor products.
| Vendor | ||
|---|---|---|
|
|
||
| Filter | ||
| Filter Cost | ||
| £ | £ | £ |
| Replacement Element Cost | ||
| £ | £ | £ |
| Replacement Elements Used (per year) | ||
| QTY | QTY | QTY |
| Back | Compare | |
| By choosing Parker Filter | ||
| Filter payback period › |
0.0
months
|
0.0
months
|
| Element payback period › |
0.0
months
|
0.0
months
|
Start new comparison Print your results
Notes:
Contact Form
If we can be of assistance, simply complete the form below and we will contact you as quickly as possible.